What is Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR)?

Photo of author
Written By Chris Ekai

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) involves the construction manager engaging in the design phase and taking on the responsibility for cost overruns during construction.

It’s a project delivery method where the construction manager collaborates closely with the design firm and acts as the general contractor on-site.

The CMAR project delivery method guarantees better cost control and effective project management.

project management, project success

If you’re curious to learn more about the benefits, risks, and considerations of CMAR, exploring further could provide valuable insights into how this methodology can impact construction projects positively.

Key Takeaways

  • CMAR involves construction manager committing to a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).
  • The construction manager bears responsibility for cost overruns.
  • Early collaboration with stakeholders enhances cost control.
  • Owner’s risk of overages is shifted to the construction manager.
  • CMAR aims to streamline communication and ensure cost management.
  • Construction managers provide early input on construction design, favorable bidding odds, higher-quality project outcomes, increased collaboration, and cost control. They are responsible for compliance with procurement regulations and fostering collaboration between various parties involved in the project.

Understanding CMAR Contracting

When delving into the domain of Understanding CMAR Contracting, it is vital to ponder key points like CMAR Contract Structure, Risk Allocation Methods, and Owner-CMAR Collaboration.

These elements play a significant role in shaping the dynamics of a construction project under the CMAR model.

Understanding how contracts are structured, risks are allocated, and collaboration is fostered between the owner and CMAR can greatly impact the success of the construction process.

The relevance of CMAR in the construction industry is underscored by its ability to streamline project management and enhance collaboration.

CMAR Contract Structure

Structured to allocate cost overrun risk to the construction manager while guaranteeing a maximum price for the owner, CMAR contracts embody a collaborative construction delivery method.

Many construction firms adopt the CMAR project delivery method due to its collaborative nature and risk management benefits.

  • Collaborative Approach:CMAR contracts involve the construction manager advising the design firm in the design phase and acting as the general contractor during construction.
  • GMP Negotiation:The construction manager negotiates a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) with the owner and bears responsibility for any costs exceeding this agreed amount.
  • Compliance Considerations:Provisions in CMAR contracts need to align with FEMA requirements, address potential conflicts with state laws, and adhere to specific CFR sections.
  • Federal Awards:CMAR contracts must include necessary compliance clauses and follow relevant guidelines for federal awards to guarantee regulatory adherence.

Risk Allocation Methods

The risk allocation methods within CMAR contracting play a pivotal role in delineating financial responsibilities between the project owner and the construction manager.

In this arrangement, the construction manager at risk assumes the burden of cost overruns, committing to delivering the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).

Through early collaboration with the owner, architect, and other stakeholders, CMAR contracts aim to enhance cost control and project outcomes. By shifting the owner’s risk of overages to the construction manager, these contracts guarantee that the construction manager takes responsibility for any costs exceeding the agreed-upon GMP.

In the CMAR method, the construction manager acts as an advocate for the owner during both the design and construction phases.

They ensure costs remain below the GMP and act as a consultant during the development and design phases, as well as the general contractor during the construction phase. This method not only streamlines communication but also holds the construction manager accountable for managing expenses effectively throughout the project.

Owner-Cmar Collaboration

Effective collaboration between the project owner and the construction manager in a CMAR contracting arrangement is vital for setting and adhering to a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) for the construction project.

The construction manager’s involvement in the development and design phases ensures that project costs are balanced and estimated accurately even before the project design is complete.

This collaboration guarantees that project costs are controlled, and decisions are made transparently.

In this process, the finalized design plays a pivotal role in providing accurate cost estimates and facilitating efficient project planning.

To achieve successful owner-CMAR collaboration, the following measures are typically incorporated:

  • Regular communication to address any changes or scope increases.
  • Detailed provisions to manage change orders effectively.
  • Implementation of cost control measures to stay within the GMP.
  • Transparent decision-making processes to maintain clarity on project costs.
  • Adherence to the agreed GMP through contractual obligations.

Pros and Cons of CMAR

The Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) approach offers distinct advantages, including:

  • Precise cost control through Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP) contracts
  • Efficient schedule management
  • Allocation of financial risks to the contractor

Additionally, collaboration with the owner promotes transparency and shared accountability for any overruns or delays that may arise during the construction process.

The CM is involved in the entire project from inception to completion, ensuring comprehensive oversight and coordination.

Cost Control Advantages

One significant advantage of utilizing the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) method lies in its effective cost control measures.

Through a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), the CMAR shifts the cost overrun risk to the construction manager, ensuring cost certainty for owners and preventing surprises during construction.

Collaboration with the CM fosters higher project quality and efficient timelines, enhancing overall project outcomes.

Accurate bids and cost-efficient solutions are achieved in CMAR projects due to the construction manager’s familiarity with the project specifics. It is important to consider more than just the lowest total construction cost in the final selection process.

However, challenges may arise, such as potential compromises in quality to meet the GMP. Selecting experienced managers is vital to mitigate these risks and avoid project failures.

  • Cost overrun risk shifted to the construction manager through a GMP.
  • Cost certainty for owners with an upper limit on project costs.
  • Collaboration leading to higher project quality and efficient timelines.
  • Accurate bids and cost-efficient solutions due to manager familiarity.
  • Importance of experienced managers to prevent project failures.

Schedule Management Benefits

Cost control advantages under the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) method pave the way for enhanced schedule management benefits by promoting proactive collaboration between stakeholders.

By involving the construction manager early in the design phase, CMAR facilitates better coordination between design and construction teams, reducing the risk of schedule delays.

Unlike other project delivery methods, which often suffer from limited contractor involvement in the design process and require changes to go through a change order process, CMAR allows the construction manager to influence the entire project’s design before bidding and act as an advocate for the owner during both the design and construction phases.

The streamlined communication process in CMAR further enhances schedule efficiency and project timelines. Additionally, the collaboration intrinsic to the CMAR approach leads to proactive problem-solving, effectively minimizing schedule disruptions.

Through the establishment of a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), CMAR secures cost control, positively impacting the overall project schedule.

This integrated approach not only fosters a more efficient construction process but also mitigates the likelihood of costly schedule delays.

Business Continuity Plan
How Much Does a Business Continuity Plan Cost?

Financial Risk Allocation

Financial risk in the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) model is effectively allocated through the establishment of a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP).

The allocation of financial risk in CMAR comes with both advantages and challenges:

  • Cost Certainty: Owners benefit from knowing the maximum price they will pay for the project.
  • Collaboration: Working with the CM during the design phase leads to better outcomes and cost savings.
  • Accurate Bids: CMAR allows for precise cost estimations due to the involvement of the construction manager.
  • Cost-Efficient Solutions: The CM can propose innovative and cost-saving solutions during the project.

Clearly defining and managing the project scope is crucial as it impacts responsibilities, risks, costs, profits, budget adherence, and overall project success.

The challenge lies in potential compromises in quality to adhere to the set maximum price.

Collaboration With Owner

Effective collaboration between the owner and the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) is essential to the success of construction projects utilizing this delivery method.

Owner collaboration in CMAR projects enhances project communication, decision-making efficiency, and overall project outcomes.

Pros of this collaboration include streamlined processes, reduced conflicts, and increased transparency throughout the construction phase.

By fostering successful collaboration, CMAR projects can achieve cost savings, improved project outcomes, and stronger stakeholder relationships.

However, challenges such as delays in decision-making and potential conflicts over scope changes may arise.

To guarantee successful collaboration, clear communication protocols, defined roles, and transparent expectations are key elements that contribute to the effective execution of CMAR projects.

Accountability for Overruns and Guaranteed Maximum Price

The Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) model introduces a distinct approach to managing accountability for overruns in construction projects.

  • Cost overrun risk is transferred to the construction manager, providing owners with cost certainty.
  • Owners benefit from collaboration with the CM to optimize designs and mitigate risks.
  • Challenges of CMAR include potential quality compromises to meet the maximum price and communication delays.
  • Effective vetting of experienced managers is critical to avoid disputes and project failures.
  • Accurate cost estimates and clear contract documents are essential for successful CMAR projects.

Early Contractor Involvement

Early Contractor Involvement in the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) model allows for collaborative planning during the design phase, benefiting from the expertise of the construction manager.

This collaboration between the construction manager and the design team helps optimize project outcomes by aligning construction strategies with the project’s design intent.

The CM commits to delivering the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), providing owners with reduced risks, increased project speed, and enhanced cost control.

By involving the construction manager early on, potential issues can be identified and addressed promptly, leading to smoother project execution.

However, challenges may arise in accurately estimating the GMP and managing any additional costs that may surface due to unforeseen circumstances.

Best Suited Projects for CMAR

Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) is most beneficial for projects with high levels of complexity, such as intricate designs and demanding scheduling needs.

The method is particularly advantageous for projects where budget sensitivity is essential, allowing for effective cost control and risk management.

Construction management plays a crucial role in CMAR projects by estimating project costs, managing construction costs, and streamlining project collaboration through construction project management software.

Project Complexity

For projects characterized by intricate designs and multifaceted stakeholder interactions, a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) serves as a superior construction delivery method.

In such complex scenarios, CMAR excels due to its ability to manage various project aspects effectively.

Here are some reasons why CMAR is well-suited for projects with high levels of complexity:

  • Efficient stakeholder coordination
  • Meeting strict schedule requirements
  • Effective cost control mechanisms
  • Adaptability to changing designs
  • Emphasis on collaboration and cost transparency

These attributes make CMAR an excellent choice for projects where construction expertise, seamless project delivery, and a reliable delivery method are essential for success.

Budget Sensitivity

Projects characterized by tight budget constraints and a critical need for cost control find Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) as the most suitable construction delivery method.

CMAR excels in managing projects with complex scopes and frequent design changes, offering a proactive budget-focused approach to mitigate cost overrun risks.

By setting a Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP), CMAR provides owners with cost certainty and transparency throughout the construction process.

This method allows owners to shift the burden of potential cost overruns to the construction manager, ensuring projects stay within budget constraints.

The collaborative nature of CMAR fosters a sense of partnership between the owner and the construction manager, promoting efficiency and accountability in budget management.

BenefitsDescriptionCost ControlCMAR ensures tight budget adherence and proactive cost management.TransparencyOwners benefit from clear and open communication regarding project finances.

Guaranteed Maximum Price (GMP)Setting a GMP provides owners with cost certainty and protection against overruns.

Risk MitigationCMAR helps mitigate cost overrun risks by actively managing budget constraints and project changes.

compliance concerns With CMAR

When implementing a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) approach, it is imperative to take into account compliance concerns. Legal obligations and regulatory requirements play a vital role in ensuring the smooth operation of CMAR projects.

Understanding and adhering to these compliance considerations is pivotal to successful project completion and maintaining transparency throughout the construction process.

Given the complex regulatory landscape surrounding construction projects, adherence to legal compliance considerations is paramount when engaging in a Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) delivery method. Some key legal compliance considerations include:

  • Federal procurement standards do not specifically address CMAR, raising compliance concerns.
  • State laws authorizing CMAR do not exempt entities from federal standards, necessitating adherence to relevant CFR sections.
  • Common compliance concerns involve conflicts of interest, responsible contractor selection, and full and open competition requirements.
  • CMAR procedures may conflict with federal rules, necessitating alignment to prevent issues.
  • Entities must comply with applicable provisions from FEMA, PDAT Field Manual, and Contract Provisions Guide in CMAR contracts to secure eligibility for awards.

Regulatory Adherence in CMAR

Legal compliance considerations play a significant role in the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) delivery method, particularly regarding regulatory adherence within CMAR contracts.

Ensuring compliance with federal procurement standards is important in CMAR contracts, as state laws authorizing CMAR do not exempt entities from following federal regulations.

CMAR procedures must align with federal rules to avoid conflicts, especially concerning issues like conflicts of interest and responsible contractor selection.

Non-state entities utilizing CMAR for construction projects must adhere to specific Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) sections to maintain regulatory adherence. Below is a table summarizing key compliance concerns in CMAR contracts:

Legal Project Manager
Legal Project Manager Jobs

Improving the CMAR Process

To improve the CMAR process, enhancing risk management practices and streamlining budget control are essential. By focusing on these points, construction projects can mitigate financial uncertainties and guarantee effective project delivery.

Implementing strategies that prioritize risk assessment and budget optimization will ultimately lead to more successful outcomes in CMAR projects.

Enhancing Risk Management During the Construction Phase

Enhancing risk management in the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) process involves guaranteeing contract clarity through defining roles, responsibilities, and payment terms.

To improve the CMAR process, consider the following:

  • Early Engagement: Involving the Construction Manager (CM) in the design phase enhances decision-making and risk mitigation.
  • Communication Protocols: Establish clear lines of communication among stakeholders to streamline information flow and reduce project risks.
  • Cost Transparency: Maintain open dialogue with the owner throughout the project to manage risks effectively and ensure project success.
  • Change Order Process: Simplify change order procedures to prevent delays and disputes, ultimately enhancing risk management in CMAR projects.

Streamlining Budget Control

Improving budget control in the Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) process involves establishing clear communication protocols among stakeholders to guarantee efficient financial management throughout the project.

Clarity on roles, responsibilities, and payment terms in the contract is crucial for effective budget control. Ensuring cost transparency with the owner throughout the project helps in avoiding surprises and delays.

Simplifying the change order process can prevent disputes and ensure smooth operation. Early engagement of the Construction Manager (CM) in the design phase enhances decision-making and project optimization.

Frequently Asked Questions

What Is a Cmar in Construction?

In construction, a CMAR, short for Construction Manager at Risk, is a delivery method where the contractor commits to completing the project within a Guaranteed Maximum Price. This approach involves early collaboration, risk management, and cost control for project success.

What Is the Purpose of a Cmar?

The purpose of a CMAR in construction is to transfer cost overrun risks to the construction manager, offering the owner cost certainty.

This model fosters collaboration, optimizes designs, promotes transparency with a Guaranteed Maximum Price, and aims to deliver high-quality projects within budget constraints.

What Is the Difference Between a Construction Manager at Risk and a General Contractor?

A Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) differs from a general contractor as it provides early project involvement, cost estimation expertise, and risk assumption throughout the construction process. CMAR acts as both consultant and contractor, ensuring project success.

Why Do Contractors Like Cmar?

Contractors appreciate CMAR for its early involvement in project planning, enabling valuable insights and cost-effective strategies during the design phase. This approach provides a competitive advantage in winning bids and mitigates risks, reducing uncertainties.

contract risk, process
Contract Risk Management Process


The Construction Manager at Risk (CMAR) is a construction delivery method that involves the contractor assuming financial risks and managing the project’s schedule and budget.

While CMAR offers benefits such as early contractor involvement and risk mitigation, it also comes with compliance concerns and may not be suitable for all projects.

By understanding the pros and cons of CMAR and improving the process, stakeholders can optimize project outcomes and foster collaboration among all parties involved.